News

California FAIR Plan’s First Assessment in Over 30 Years

Stephanie Duchene, Esq.

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

(310) 855-3066

sduchene@willkie.com

 

The unprecedentedly destructive fires in the Los Angeles area in January are reported to have caused total property losses in the hundreds of billions, with insured losses reportedly estimated as high as $75 billion.[1]  The California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan (the “FAIR Plan”) has reported receiving approximately 5,000 claims and paying more than $1.2 billion to policyholders.[2]

The FAIR plan, established pursuant to Section 10090 et seq. of the California Insurance Code (the “CIC”), is an independent, not-for-profit catastrophe insurer, formed in joint association by insurance carriers licensed to write and engaged in writing basic property insurance in California.[3]  Although intended to be an insurer of last resort, it has taken an outsized role in insuring residential and commercial properties in California that have been increasingly unable to obtain coverage on the admitted market.  Many admitted carriers have recently limited new business or sought to non-renew existing property business in California and some attribute that, at least in part, to difficulties in obtaining rate increases reflecting current risks. As the admitted market has shrunk, FAIR Plan exposure has grown significantly.  As of September 2024, FAIR Plan exposure totaled $458 billion, including $5.9 billion in wildfire exposure in Pacific Palisades alone.[4]

The FAIR Plan is administered in accordance with a plan of operation approved by the California Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”), most recently amended in August 2024.[5] Member insurers participate in the writing, expenses, profits and losses of the FAIR plan in proportion to their premiums written as compared to aggregate premiums written by all insurers in the program.[6] Funds for potential payment of claims are obtained through FAIR Plan policyholder premiums, as well as substantial reinsurance coverage purchased by the FAIR Plan under its statutory authorization.  The FAIR Plan may, with the Commissioner’s authorization, levy assessments against member insurers to fund claims and expenses. [7]

Although characterized by the Commissioner as “highly unlikely” as recently as September 2024,[8] on February 11, 2025 the Commissioner approved, through Order 2025-1, the first FAIR Plan assessment on members since 1994.[9]  The FAIR Plan immediately notified each admitted market insurer of their assessment responsibility, funds for which must be remitted within 30 days of the date of notice.[10] Assessments accrue interest (at the federal reserve discount rate plus 250 basis points) if unpaid within thirty days of notice, and an insurer that fails to pay may have its certificate of authority suspended or revoked unless granted an exemption or deferment by the Commissioner on the basis that payment would bring it below statutory minimum capital and surplus requirements.[11] Where affiliated insurers are impacted, the insurance group may designate a carrier to pay the assessment on behalf of the group.[12]

Recent guidance allows insurers to recoup the cost of assessments from policyholders under certain circumstances, but only if the insurer confirms that its assessment payment was not covered by reinsurance or reimbursed through other means.[13] Requests to recoup assessment amounts are subject in all instances to the filing and prior approval requirements of California’s Proposition 103 and must be made within six months of the FAIR Plan’s assessment notice,[14] which would likely delay the immediate impact on insurer policyholders of such recoupment.  This recoupment process is unprecedented and it remains to be seen how the California Department of Insurance will address such requests.



[1] UCLA Newsroom, February 4, 2025 regarding the UCLA Anderson Forecast economist report.  https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/los-angeles-wildfires-caused-up-to-164-billion-in-property-capital-losses#:~:text=A%20new%20report%20from%20the,losses%20estimated%20at%20%2475%20billion.

[2] Update From the California FAIR Plan, February 21, 2025: https://www.cfpnet.com/update-from-the-california-fair-plan-6/

[3] California FAIR Plan Association Plan of Operation dated August 27, 2024 § III (the “Plan of Operation”). Basic Property Insurance is defined as:

insurance against direct loss to real or tangible personal property at a fixed location in those geographic or urban areas, as designated by the commissioner, from perils insured under the standard fire policy and extended coverage endorsement, from vandalism and malicious mischief, and includes other insurance coverages as may be added with respect to that property . . . with the approval of the commissioner or by the commissioner, but shall not include insurance on automobile risks, commercial agricultural commodities or livestock, or equipment used to cultivate or transport agricultural commodities or livestock. Cal. Ins. Code § 10091(c)(1).

[4] California FAIR Plan Association Key Statistics & Data (no date), https://www.cfpnet.com/key-statistics-data/.

[5] CIC § 10095.

[6] Plan of Operation § XXI.

[7] CIC § 10094(c); Plan of Operation § XXI.

[8] California Department of Insurance Bulletin 2024-8, September 3, 2024, “Insurer Recoupment Procedures in the Highly Unlikely Event of Assessment by the FAIR Plan” https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0250-insurers/0300-insurers/0200-bulletins/bulletin-notices-commiss-opinion/upload/BULLETIN_2024-8__RE_INSURER_RECOUPMENT_PROCEDURES_IN_THE_HIGHLY_UNLIKELY_EVENT_OF_ASSESSMENT_BY_THE_FAIR_PLAN.pdf.

[9] ORDER NO. 2025-1 APPROVING THE CALIFORNIA FAIR PLAN ASSOCIATION’S REQUEST TO ISSUE ASSESSMENT, February 11, 2025, https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0250-insurers/0500-legal-info/0700-commissioners-orders/upload/Order-No-2025-1-Approving-the-California-FAIR-Plan-Association-s-Request-to-Issue-Assessment.pdf.

[10] The assessment amount is “based on the proportion that the insurer’s premiums written during the second preceding calendar year for that line of business bear to the aggregate premiums written by all insurers in the program for that line of business, excluding that portion of the premiums written attributable to the operation of the association,” bifurcated between Dwelling and Commercial Property Policies (Division I policies) and multiperil Businessowners’ policies (Division II policies) to reflect losses proportionate to that line of business. Plan of Operation § VII.D.

[11] See id. § VII.D.3.

[12] Id. § VII.D.8.

[13] Bulletin 2024-8 pp. 2–3; California Department of Insurance Bulletin 2025-4, February 11, 2025, pp. 2-5  https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0250-insurers/0300-insurers/0200-bulletins/bulletin-notices-commiss-opinion/upload/Bulletin-2025-4-Updated-Guidance-regarding-Insurer-Recoupment-Procedures-in-Response-to-Assessment-by-the-FAIR-Plan.pdf.

[14] Id.; Cal. Ins. Code § 1861.01 et seq.

 

FORC Elects 2025 Officers & Directors

Members of the Federation of Regulatory Counsel (FORC) elected the following 2025 leaders:  

OFFICERS

  • Chairman,  James GkonosSaul Ewing LLP
  • Vice Chair, A. Kenneth LevineCozen O'Connor
  • Treasurer, Mark WarrenInglish & Monaco, P.C.
  • Secretary, Julie Pomerantz, Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, PLLC
  • Vice President, David Aafedt, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.
  • Vice President, Tasha Cycholl, Kutak Rock LLP
  • Vice President, Robert Ferm, Hall & Evans, L.L.C.
  • Vice President, Robert House, Jones Walker LLP
  • Vice President, Ronnie Johnson, Holland & Knight
  • Vice President, David Liggett, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
  • Vice President, Ann Monaco Warren, Inglish & Monaco, P.C.
  • Vice President, Frederick PomerantzInsurance Legal & Regulatory Consulting, PLLC
  • Vice President, Ralph Rexach, Rexach & Pico
  • Vice President, Ryan SmartSmart, Schofield, Shorter, P.C.
  • Vice President, Scott Sorkin, Bland & Sorkin P.C.

 DIRECTORS

  • West Director, Nicole M. Zayac, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 
  • At Large Director, C. Ignacio Matos, Rexach & Pico, CSP
  • Southeast Director, A. Kenneth LevineCozen O'Connor  
  • Mountain Director, Daniel Furman, Hall & Evans, LLC
  • South Central Director, Julie Pomerantz, Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, PLLC
  • Northeast Director, Vikram Sidhu, Mayer Brown LLP
  • At Large Director, Frederic Garsson, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
  • At Large Director, James GkonosSaul Ewing LLP
  • At Large Director, Matthew Coble, Mette, Evans, & Woodside, P.C.
  • At Large Director, Steven Beeghly, Beeghly Ricoy Law Group
  • Midwest Director, Anthony Spina, Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • At Large Director, Fred Karlinsky, Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
  • Plains Director, Mark G.R. Warren, Inglish & Monaco, P.C.